Hi Sébastien,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:25:42AM +0100, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> Thanks for checking this!
You are welcome.
> > However, I have two remarks.
> > I wonder if its really necessary to ship whole ZIP archives
> > of
> > not yet packaged JS libs. If I where you I would only ship the
> > sources
> > (= not minimised) and minimize + install them in d/rules.
>
> As suggested, I have just removed the whole ZIP archives, and only put the
> JS/CSS/images/fonts stuff inside the package [1]. This of course greatly
> reduces the size of the source package.
This was the idea.
> > It's advisable to use dh_linktree for the
> > Debian packaged JS files (feel free to ask for details if the hint
> > might
> > be inclear).
>
> I must admit that I do not understand the use of dh_linktree together with
> the orthanc-webviewer package... Indeed, the CMake build script of the
> Orthanc Web Viewer embeds all the JavaScript resources directly inside the
> C++ code, creating a fully standalone shared library. In other words, the
> Debian packaged JS files are not needed when installing the package, but only
> when building it from source.
>
> Could you give me additional hint for the current use case?
No, sorry, I can't. :-) I was not aware about the option that JS files
can be only consumed at build time and have not realised that the *.deb
package does not contain any JS. Jus forget my hint.
I'll upload as is since I think the package is fine.
Thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
> [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med?view=revision&revision=18890
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150302130642.ga2...@an3as.eu
