Hi Thiago,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:25:35PM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote:
> > I do not think that this was an explicite suggestion of Mathieu - he
> > just intended to write what would be possible / acceptable packaging
> > wise. It is definitely no good packaging practice to use convinience
> > copies of some code which is developed somewhere else as in the source
> > tree of the project in question. In Debian we try hard to modularise
> > software and to not duplicate code. Just assume ca_smoothing could be
> > used by some other imaging project.
>
> Ok. A question: Do you think it's better to split the package in
> libcasmoothing and python-casmoothing or only python-casmoothing?
That's a bit tricky to answer for me because I have no idea about
casmoothing at all. As a rule of thumb you should be guided by the
answer to the question: Is there any chance that some libcasmoothing
could be reasonably used without the Python interface or not?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121011063617.ga16...@an3as.eu
