On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:32:11AM -0400, Carlos Borroto wrote:
>
> I agree on following stable releases as a general rule. The reason I
> chose to use development version of cummeRbund was because at the time
> upstream was recommending it. The package was on heavy development and
> stable releases tied to Bioconductor were getting behind quite fast. I
> just checked the upstream website and now the recommendation is to use
> the stable version tied to Bioconductor.
>
> I just finish my semester yesterday and I plan to get up to speed with
> several TODOs I have with the packages I'm contributing to.
Thanks for the clarification.
> I'll do this update right away.
Just let us know if you need any help / sponsoring.
Kind regards and thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
