Hi, this mail is primarly targeted to Andreas, but if someone has an opinion.... upstream author of licensed issue file in JLAPACK agreed to change its license to a compatible one. However, as upstream code has been modified in JLAPACK software, I must reintegrate modifications made by JLAPACK team in upstream code. This is fine but I cannot patch it (would mean source code is not licensed compliant), so I have to remove impacted file and provide it myself via debian dir.
As orig source code has to be modified, and as there is no tarball to download (only CVS), I wonder if it would make sense that I fork the upstream code, apply modifications on licensed file and provide a source tarball myself. Upstream code has not been modified for 4 years now, so we can think it is freezed and would not cause issue to fork it. What do you think ? Olivier -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f7034ee.5090...@irisa.fr
