On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > As a last resort for the *initial* packaging it might work out. Once we > are doing the real packaging we should not try such dirty tricks.
Now that we can generate a mumps compiler by way of compiling only C code I wonder whether there's still a need to separate between "initial" and "real" packaging ? After all, no "bootstrapping" is needed anymore ? AFAIU we are currently creating a (standard) package for a "programming-language-with-database-called-M" from its FLOSS implementation "GT.M" by FiS ? Having done that we would be creating a package to install VistA as one (complex) application running in/on the installed-by-package M environment (incidentally being fis-gtm). While, yes, one requires the other both are "proper" or "real" packages ? Am I on the wrong track ? Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
