Olivier Sallou <olivier.sal...@irisa.fr> writes: > thanks for your reviews. > I won't have time to progress in next 2 weeks. > I will refresh svn and have a look at this time
No problem; I know how that goes. > I'd like to be as close as possible form original source code for maintenance That's fair, though I will note for the record that the build system adapts well to missing subtrees, as long as they weren't actually necessary. > For additional package, do you mean an "identical" blast package with > just binaries renamed. to avoid conflicts? to be used in place of > "basic" package? I had envisioned a package that would depend on ncbi-blast+ (or ncbi-blast-plus if you insist) and just contain the necessary symlinks. That said, such an approach would probably be excessive; instead, one further possibility would be for the regular package to contain a directory (/usr/lib/ncbi-blast+/bin, perhaps) containing such symlinks, which users could then add to their PATHs as desired. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/udl8vuhrg4b....@dr-wily.mit.edu
