Hi Alexander, thank you for the fast answer! Le Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:55:55AM +0100, Alexander Wirt a écrit : > Charles Plessy schrieb am Monday, den 23. November 2009: > > > I have another question… The package I tried to upload is ‘bwa’, which has a > > popcon score of less than ten, but of course a bright future :) It seems to > > contradict directly your rule ‘Please only upload package with a noteable > > userbase’. My purpose in this upload is to offer backports from a highly > > trustable environment, in order to help the creation of ‘cloud’ images based > > on Lenny but with the latest software in my speciality. Would such packages > > be accepted ? (I am their maintainer in Debian). > Even after reading the description I don't have a clue what to do with that > application :). But go ahead.
I just uploaded bwa to bp.o's NEW queue. bwa is part of a bunch of packages related to ‘next-generation sequencing’, that is about sequencing (our) genomes. Not to mention that it is useful for my work, I also hope that by supporting free software in this area it will help to build a good world, in opposition to a ‘Brave New World’ ! I would like to backport the bioperl package as well (a bigger beast), and it needs ExtUtils::Manifest >= 1.52 to build (but not to run). However Lenny's perl-modules package does not provide such a high version. If I package ExtUtils::Manifest, let it go in testing, and if you then accept a backport of it, will it be possible to build a bioperl backport using it? Said differently, do the backports buildds use backports.org to satisfy dependancies not in Lenny? (Sorry I did not manage to find the information). Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
