Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Le Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:29:21PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : > > R 2.10.0, due out October 26, will switch to an internal html converter from > the latex-alike Rd format coupled with an internal webserver. See below for > the section on 'Significant user-visible changes' in the NEWS file from > 2.10.0 -- taken from the Oct 13 beta currently in unstable. > > This means we "should" rebuild all packages or else they will upon load > trigger a nagging message 'package foo was built under R version x.y.z and > may not function properly' as well as possible malfunctions of the help > system. As we're only talking 100+ packages, this should work.
Dear release team, we are in the course of rebuilding the CRAN Arch:all packages against the beta of R 2.10.0, that Dirk already uploaded to Unstable. Could you binNMU the following Arch: any packages? That would be a great help. nmu r-cran-epibasix_1.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).' nmu r-other-mott-happy_2.1-4 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).' nmu r-cran-colorspace_1.0.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).' nmu r-cran-msm_0.9.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).' nmu r-cran-sp_0.9.36-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).' nmu r-cran-spc_0.21-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).' Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
