Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'd like to give an update on the "Enhances" issue. For the moment our > development instance of the webtools (debian-med.debian.net and > blends.debian.net) are running some new code which displays the packages > which are enhancing a package at the bottom of the long description (if > there is any such package). Watch out for strings > > "The package is enhanced by the following packages:" > > to see what I mean - there are not that many currently. This is to have > a first overview, which packages are concerned in this topic. As I told > you my plan is to include those enhancing packages into our bug > sentinel. The reasoning for using this control field is given below and > in a discussion on debian-devel. > > Steffen, you had problems with this but did not responded to my last > mail even if I explicitely asked you to. So I assume you are either > overworked or convinced. I would like to continue with this topic and > need a decision. So I will *assume* you agree if I turn your > > Enhanced-By > > fields in the tasks files into > > Enhances > > fields in the package in question in our SVN to let it propagate with > the next upload. Please tell me if you think this is not a good idea > and you are not happy with this change. I feel mentally absobed, indeed. I don't agree, but let us see what happens. How one names attributes we can still talk about at some later time. Have many thanks for your efforts, I am curious to see what happens Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
