Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 13:33 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:55:04PM +0000, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > >> +common-build-arch:: > > >> + echo "$(pkg_lib): package-name-doesnt-match-sonames" > > > >> debian/$(pkg_lib).lintian-overrides > > >> + dh_lintian > > > > > > I don't think that ftpmaster will really like this. Why not just > > > adapting the package name? If there are real reasons to do so please > > > also add a comment about the reasons to the override. > > > > This is just a lintian style issue. This is how -AFAIK- you can > > provide a libvxl package which provides a libvnl.so / > > libvnl_testing.so... I have been using it in GDCM, I saw that in other > > packages too. > > JFTR: A lintian override for a package shipping several libraries is > IMHO fully correct. There is no policy to split the library package into > several packages with one package per library. At least I don't know > one. > > The package name is IMO still wrong. It should be libvxl1 and not > libvxl1.13 according to the library packaging guide and a simple [snip]
Ah sorry. Missed the lib*.so._1.13_ -> lib*.so.1.13.0 Should be correct then. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
