On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 04:57:20PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Bill Allombert > <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:16:22PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> Hi Bill, > >> > >> What are the transition plan for libjpeg7 ? There are -at least- two > >> packages that I know of which link to libjpeg62: VTK & ITK ? Should we > >> update the package control file ? Or is there something else being > >> prepared (like a libjpeg-default package). > > > > At this point, what you should do is check that your package Build-depend > > on 'libjpeg-dev' (without the version) and not on 'libjpeg62-dev'. > > At some point libjpeg7-dev will provide libjpeg-dev and libjpeg62-dev > > will be removed from the archive. > > What is libjpeg-dev ? > > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libjpeg-dev > > I cannot find it.
This is a virtual package. THe usual policy for libray is that the current libfooN-dev provides the virtual package libfoo-dev, and program Build-Depends on libfoo-dev. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org