[ I wrote this response before I noticed it's on d-med instead of d-science. I think it's relevant there as well, so CC'ed. ]
> Le Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:11:50AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > I'm personally quite sloppy to add usertags to WNPP bugs because for *me* > > the > > tasks pages serve the same purpose. On the other hand there is nothing > > against to be strict with the WNPP usertags - but I have no time to deal > > with > > this for now. I guess we are lagging behind with other WNPPs as well. True. I used to try to keep them update for Debian Science for a while but stopped doing so at some point. I do not use that feature anymore and therefore would not mind if we drop it. Am Freitag, den 18.09.2009, 21:11 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: > I also think that the tasks files made WNPP tagging much less useful. If > nobody > uses this feature anymore, I propose I remove it from our group policy as well > as from our wiki pages. I wanted to start working on the (Debian Science) policy again in the very near future because there are quite some issues. I put it on my TODO list. If this feature is really useful for some people, we might think about automagically extracting the relevant information from the task pages and mailing the BTS, so the data is updated in only one place (task pages). I once wrote a small wrapper for reportbug to include user tag pseudo-header fields for certain tasks (not meant as in "task pages" here), mainly for personal use. I could make it available if there is interest in it. Do other blends use this feature? If any effort would be made in this direction, blends would probably the right place. Best regards Manuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
