Hi Paolo,
I tried to upgrade the imagej package to the latest upstream version while
trying to fix at least one bug which seems to be a low hanging fruit (#505315):
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, [email protected] wrote:
Author: tille
Date: 2009-03-30 09:03:19 +0000 (Mon, 30 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 3229
Modified:
trunk/packages/imagej/trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/packages/imagej/trunk/debian/control
trunk/packages/imagej/trunk/debian/imagej.sh
Log:
Use dirname/readlink /usr/bin/java instead upf update-alternatives to obtain JVM
New upstream version; unfortunately there seems to be a regression in Upstream
code with JPEGEncoder so this package does not build
...
...
[javac]
param.setDensityUnit(JPEGEncodeParam.DENSITY_UNIT_DOTS_INCH);
[javac] ^
[javac] /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.42l/ij/plugin/JpegWriter.java:54: cannot find
symbol
[javac] symbol : variable DENSITY_UNIT_DOTS_INCH
[javac] location: class com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGEncodeParam
[javac]
param.setDensityUnit(JPEGEncodeParam.DENSITY_UNIT_DOTS_INCH);
[javac]
^
[javac] /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.42l/ij/plugin/filter/AVI_Writer.java:372:
warning: com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGCodec is Sun proprietary API and may be
removed in a future release
[javac] jpegEncoder =
JPEGCodec.createJPEGEncoder(raOutputStream);
[javac] ^
[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
[javac] 5 errors
[javac] 8 warnings
I vaguely remember that there were some issues with ImageJ upstream handling of
JPEG and I wonder whether this is just a regression. Could you please comment
on this?. Would you be able to verify the other bug reported against ImageJ
concerning the Plugin behaviour?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
