On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:31:01AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:58 PM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:07 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> Do you think this is a valid change to apply to gdcm debian package: > > No: > > > >> $ svn di > >> Index: rules > >> =================================================================== > >> --- rules (revision 4863) > >> +++ rules (working copy) > >> @@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ > >> DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) > >> DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) > >> > >> -CFLAGS = -g > >> +ifneq (,$(findstring debug,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
Please see the Debian Policy manual, section 4.9.1 on the correct set of default CFLAGS and handling of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS (debug is not one of the currently used DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS). > Where is it documented that strip (removing of symbols via strip) > should be binded to the -g of gcc ? You should be able to strip a > release build (gcc -03 ... ), right ? It's not related indeed. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
