On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:37:53 +0200 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, 18 May 2008, David Paleino wrote: > > >> Author: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> -Forwared: Not yet > >> +Forwared: Mon, 19 May 2008 04:01:11 +0900 > >> --- a/purge/Makefile > >> +++ b/purge/Makefile > >> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > > > > Charles, I'm not a DD, so I'm asking to you (and Andreas, and Nelson, and > > $DD) to do a proposal on -devel :) > > You ask what?? Well, We could perfectly do this, but why do you assume that > only DDs can issue proposals????
Well... bad habit? :) > > Can we standardize the patch header? Be it quilt, dpatch, $foo, the header > > might be something like: > > > > Author: > > Forwarded: > > Description: > > > > I'm currently starting to use this format: > > > > Author: Foo Bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Forwarded: no | http://$url_of_upstream_BTS_with_patch > > Reason: foo > > another line > > . > > Another paragraph > > So try rather: > > Reason: foo > another line > . > Another paragraph I believe my MUA ripped off those spaces :) (yes, I meant to do it RFC822-compliant) > > Do you (all) believe that would be a good idea? :) > > I don't care whether _all_ people believe something. Sorry, that "(all)" was meaning "Charles, Andreas and others", not all in absolute sense :) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
