Le Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:56:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > >Downgraded dialign-t-data to recommends. > >apt-get and aptitude will install dialign-t-data together with > >dialign-t, unless the user overrides this. > > I would disagree with this if dialign-t does not work without dialign-t-data > installed (which is what I understood from Charles explanation). If > dialign-t _Depends_ from the data we should exactly express this fact and > should not relay on the behaviour of apt-get.
Hi all, dialign-t (the program) will not work without dialign-t-data (the package) unless the user knows what he is doing and provides a path to alternative matrices in the command line. If dialign-t Recommends: dialign-t-data, then it is possible to uninstall dialign-t-data and to use alternative matrices in /usr/share/dialign-t under a name taken by some of the ones distributed by dialign-t-data. In the end, I hardly can find a reason why somebody would want to do that. So let's Depend: dialign-t-data. Sorry for changing my mind twice :) > Ahh, and I would suggets '=' instead of '>='. There is probably no > guarantee that higher versions of dialign-t will work with old data > packages. To make the system consistent I would force same source > versions installed. Good point: new upstream version could use a default matrix which is not present in the current one. I have commited the changes in the SVN, Good night and afternoon, -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wako, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
