Hi Aurelien, On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 07:17:08PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2024-08-31 11:29, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > El 31/08/24 a las 16:43, Adrian Bunk escribió: > > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 10:12:19AM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > > >... > > > > It seems the bullseye-security upload queue is finally open (now that > > > > the point release has been published). > > > >... > > > > > > Are you talking only about the ftp side, or also about the buildd side? > > > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/ still looks wrong, that's why I'm asking. > > > > I cannot really tell, I am afraid. Adding the FTP team and Buildd Teams > > to the loop to ask for their help. > > Can please you tell us what is wrong on buildd.d.o? Not knowning the > issue, it is difficult to fix it. > > Just a few details on the wanna-build / buildd side to avoid the usual > endless and useless discussions: > - The buildds are able to handle LTS builds since a bit before the > release of Bullseye, as the choice is now to reuse the existing > -security suite. Nothing has to be done besides making the suites > public on the web interface. > - The bullseye-security suite was made public on Aug 19. > - The non-LTS architecture got removed from wanna-build on Aug 31 after > the release of the latest Bullseye point release.
I replied to Santiago sending the "upload queue is finally open" email, this was after the move of wuiet to faster hardware but before you removed the non-LTS architectures. Regarding the buildd side, removing the non-LTS architectures from bullseye-security was desirable before doing LTS uploads. It all got overshadowed by the ftp team making the required changes to bullseye-security only after the point release, and them being unresponsive in the two weeks before that. > Regards > Aurelien cu Adrian