Hi Santiago,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 03:07:51PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As suggested by Moritz, giving the status of iotjs, I think it is not
> possible to support it during the bullseye LTS period. iotjs was removed
> from unstable (and bookworm when it was testing) nearly two years ago:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1354004/removed-10715-1-from-unstable/.
>
> It was not properly maintained in unstable, the debian bullseye version
> is lagging a long way behind upstream, and there are 65 security issues
> currently open.
>
> If there are not objections, I will add it to debian-security-support's
> security-support-ended.deb11 by next Tuesday.
Actually I would like to propose something else to consider: the
package has a very low popcon and it has no reverse dependecies:
carnil@coccia:~$ dak rm --suite=bullseye -n -R iotjs
Will remove the following packages from bullseye:
iotjs | 1.0+715-1 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el,
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
iotjs-dev | 1.0+715-1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel,
ppc64el, s390x
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
<pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
carnil@coccia:~$
So the package can be safely removed I would say and so my proposal
would be to ask for removal of iotjs in the last bullseye point
release.
What do you think?
Regards,
Salvatore
