On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 11:56:11AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hi, > > Since then: > - gpac was EOLd in buster > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debian-security-support/-/commit/a0bfdf01d404aba46893d2971d776f8f7fb5337e > - gpac was removed from bookworm > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1430135/gpac-removed-from-testing/ > - gpac was removed from sid > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1548977/removed-221dfsg1-31-from-unstable/ > > gpac in bullseye still has >100 open CVEs and I don't believe the situation > described by Roberto improved. > > Do we want to mark gpac EOL for bullseye as well? > Given the circumstances and the state of the package, yes I agree that we should move ahead with EOL. Could you file an EOL issue in GitLab?
Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez
