Hi Sean No I did not see it. I did not realize that since there were no note in dla-needed. Anyway thank you for letting med know. I'll check what you have determined already.
/ Ola Den lör 13 apr. 2024 01:23Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> skrev: > Hello, > > On Sat 13 Apr 2024 at 12:49am +02, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > Hi fellow LTS contributors > > > > Today I started on bind9 and realized one thing. In bullseye the > > security update is to release a new upstream version (released as > > 1:9.16.48-1) instead of patching the old version > > (1:9.16.44-1~deb11u1). For some reason the version used is -1 instead > > of ~deb11u1. > > > > Since this is not the normal practice I'd like to check so we have a > > common agreement that this is the best also for LTS/buster. > > > > In this case I think it is the safest method. Trying to pick the > > individual patches can be risky. > > Or do we know any specific reason why we should not go this path? > > I tried working on this a couple of weeks ago and addressed some > questions to this list -- did you see my post? I hadn't realised it had > been a whole two weeks since I'd posted. > > -- > Sean Whitton >
