Hi Yes I read that. But should we keep it in dla needed when it is to update a non lts release? I thought the purpose of dla needed was for lts.
I understand the need to do forward porting but is dla needed the place for that? / Ola Den mån 8 apr. 2024 13:33Sylvain Beucler <b...@beuc.net> skrev: > Hi, > > Please read the dla-needed.txt entry. > It says we should sync *bullseye*. > > Cheers! > Sylvain > > On 07/04/2024 23:47, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hi fellow LTS contributors > > > > I was about to assign runc to myself but realized that it should not be > > in dla-needed. > > There is just one CVE to be fixed and that one is marked as no-dsa with > > note minor issue. > > > > I will therefore do the following. > > Change the no-dsa to postponed and remove runc from dla-needed. > > > > If anyone have any objections, please let me know. >
