Hi

I checked the four new CVEs and my conclusion is that the vulnerable code
is not present. I'm not 100% sure because the code is so extremely
different but I'm pretty sure about it. At least I cannot even grep for
"surrounding code" in the area where the fix is made.

Based on that I marked them as not-affected.

I think this applies to the rest of the CVEs in the list as well, but I
have not checked.

Cheers

// Ola

On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 20:34, Sylvain Beucler <b...@beuc.net> wrote:

> Hi Ola,
>
> On 12/03/2024 20:52, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > I have claimed the package myself now. I think the conclusion will be
> > that all are minor issues and the package do not need an update. But we
> > will see when I have gone through all the CVEs.
>
> tinymce is only available up to buster, so we don't have to sync with
> stable/oldstable, and can make a decision directly.
>
> >     However if you look more closely, you can see that all
> >     those CVEs are of "cross site scripting" nature and when you look at
> >     the rest of the issues in that list there are many more with the
> >     same type of issue and then marked as no-dsa.
>
> In this case, XSS is defeating the core feature of the tool, so I would
> fix them.
>
> >     If I would have triaged this package as front-desk I would have
> >     marked the rest the same with the reasoning that there are anyway so
> >     many of the same type so it does not help to fix a few others.
>
> The newer CVEs weren't shown in FD's tools since it was already added to
> dla-needed.txt, hence why they weren't triaged.
>
> >     So my question is:
> >     - Should those CVEs that are not no-dsa today be marked as no-dsa
> >     and in that case the package to be removed from dla-needed?
> >     or
> >     - Should the XSS type issues already be marked as no-dsa in fact
> >     have the no-dsa tag removed and we should fix them as well?
>
> See also my other mail on interpreting "no-dsa" in the context of LTS.
>
> Here we've got a bunch of postponed XSS to fix, and a sponsor, so I'd
> say go ahead a publish a DLA to fix them all :)
>
> Cheers!
> Sylvain
> FD this week
>
>

-- 
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
|  o...@inguza.com                    o...@debian.org            |
|  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to