On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 11:02 +0000, roucaries bastien wrote: > Le dim. 18 juin 2023 à 19:16, Ola Lundqvist <o...@inguza.com> a écrit : > [adding security team] [...] > > > You mention rebuild all reverse dependencies. Well I do not find any > > within Debian. > > This makes it even less important to fix it. > > Yes, but for firefox it is embeded (code duplication not nice). May be > (so copy security team) deemded it and link to the lib. Less work
So we can expect Firefox upstream to update their copy.
> > ola@buster-lts:~/build$ apt-rdepends -r libusrsctp1
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > libusrsctp1
> > Reverse Depends: libusrsctp-dev (= 0.9.3.0+20190127-2)
> > Reverse Depends: libusrsctp-examples (= 0.9.3.0+20190127-2)
> > libusrsctp-dev
> > libusrsctp-examples
> > ola@buster-lts:~/build$ apt-rdepends -r libusrsctp-dev
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > libusrsctp-dev
>
> No it is incomplete:
> grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends libusrsctp-dev -w -sPackage
> /var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources
> give me:
> - janus on o-o-stable-backport
>
> Do not know what to do with it.
buster-backports is not supported at all, so we don't need to care
about that.
I think we can mark this package us unsupported.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed
- Carolyn Scheppner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
