On 6/12/2023 11:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3452-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/               Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
June 12, 2023                                 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : thunderbird
Version        : 1:102.12.0-1~deb10u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2023-34414 CVE-2023-34416

Multiple security issues were discovered in Thunderbird, which could
result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code.

For Debian 10 buster, these problems have been fixed in version
1:102.12.0-1~deb10u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your thunderbird packages.

Although unrelated with the security issues above, may I ask something 
that I noticed for the first time in Thunderbird 102.11.0 (32-bit) that 
annoys me and what differs from some older versions in the past, as I 
can remember:  In fact, a right click on a message body (in the message 
pane, F8) opens the 'Save As ...' option. Then in the new opened window 
a file name shall be entered. However, it is per default offered to save 
the message under a rather complex name composed by all of these: 
Subject-Sender <sender_email> Day Time.eml
And for some reason I get the response: 'Unable to save the message. 
Please check your file name."
So, after testing different variant of file names, I discovered that the 
best option is when the name includes only the Subject (and not the 
rest). It makes me wonder if it would be possible for a user to set it 
per default, so it would not be needed to shorten the file name each 
time. (I mean, to configure saving the message under a name that 
includes only the Subject and nothing else.)
Furthermore, I noticed that message saving under a name that includes 
some non-alphabet characters, such as colon or like, also tends to fail. 
And it fails under some Linux versions, but not in Windows ones. What 
may be a reason for that? Thank you.
Miroslav


Reply via email to