El 20/03/23 a las 09:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: > Hi Otto, > > I do run lintian from the target release before upload (actually on every > build). I don't think running lintian from sid for (old*)stable makes sense > as I'm not interested in newly introduced warnings or errors that affect > sid. I'm interested in having the most stable lintian warnings, so that if > there are any new errors, it's because of changes I made (and I need to look > into it). > > On 19/03/2023 23:04, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > Following up on this topic, I noticed that I can't even manually > > override the Lintian image version at the moment as the > > Buster/Bullseye/Bookworm tags don't exist at > > https://salsa.debian.org/groups/salsa-ci-team/-/container_registries/295 > > > > To fix this I filed now > > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/merge_requests/407 > > You can probably use the base:$(RELEASE) image and install lintian yourself. > > > I am a bit surprised I seem to be the only one running Salsa-CI when > > preparing stable/LTS uploads, this issue must have been making the > > pipeline red for everybody building RELEASE=bullseye/buster/stretch.
Not really, because of this, from salsa-ci.yml: SALSA_CI_IMAGES_LINTIAN: ${SALSA_CI_IMAGES}/lintian:latest > > Not the only one! I have been looking at the Salsa CI very recently and have > made improvements to use it for *oldstable, please see [1] and [2]. I'm not > building images for bullseye atm, however if you find this useful, I'll be > happy to add them. ... I think I already said something about this, but I am open to change the above line to SALSA_CI_IMAGES_LINTIAN: ${SALSA_CI_IMAGES}/lintian:${RELEASE} if there is a consensus/enough input from the pipeline users, as there is seems to be.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature