On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 12:02:57PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > The rationale about that change (or rather the decision about how to fix > broken lintian image/job) is here, after input by lechner: > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/merge_requests/347#note_303815 > > Ideally, I would expect lintian be clever enough to analyse the package > according to the target release. But that's not the case, and I can > image that's not a simple solution, so we are seeing errors like this > you are reporting. > > Is the current lintian behaviour in Salsa CI broken? > Should the lintian job run the lintian version found in ${RELEASE}?
Ok, I'll step out of the conversation on what the Salsa CI should do. As a takeaway point about my specific issue I'll ignore those specific lintian errors on ffmpeg for now. I also won't add lintian overrides for them, unless someone tells me that those errors would cause an upload to be rejected. Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
