Hi Neil, On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:34 PM Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> wrote: > So far, opinion (Sebastien, Raphael & I) is all for option C: - leave > ccextractor unchanged in buster. > > Have I missed another solution? Does anyone object to adopting solution > C:?
I spent some time on this during my FD duty a couple of weeks ago and then some more time this week and I think what you propose is the best way forward. I could reproduce most™ of the things you mentioned and came to the same conclusion. Option A, for sure, increases a lot of technical debt, unnecessarily - a no-go. Option B, whilst seems reasonable, also increases the debt (though) by half but is still a whole lotta work for (very) little benefit! - a no-go. And so option C, in my opinion, is the best way compromise we can do here and thus the best plausible option we have. +1 to what you have proposed. - u
