Hi Ola, > My guess has been that we should not generally fix lintian warnings > unless they are really important.
(Agree with this, of course.) > So I assume quite a few of them could be removed. But maybe I'm wrong > here. That could work, although it would have the drawback of potentially hiding the "really important" tags. I suspect we should only consider removing/hiding tags if they were somehow introduced by the LTS update process itself. Or, putting it another way: in the usual case, there should probably be no difference between the Lintian output between before and after applying a fix for relevant CVE(s)? Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk `-