Thanks for the clarification. Would that really be an issue if they got it? They will get the newer version later. But I get the point. In any case it is not an urgent thing so we can wait. I'll add notes about this too.
// Ola On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 00:53, Sylvain Beucler <b...@beuc.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 19/06/2020 23:29, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > In the DLA needed entry for libdatetime-timezone-perl you have > > mentioned that we need to wait for oldstable update via point release > > before the LTS update is made. When looking at the version numbers for > > the different releases I fail to see the necessity of that. > > > > Have I missed something? Or is this note false? > > From what I understand, we want to provide 2020a-0+deb8u1 but if we do > before 2019c-0+deb9u1 -> 2020a-0+deb9u1 is done on stretch, people who > upgrade jessie -> stretch will retain the jessie package (while they > should use the stretch package). > > See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958995 > > Cheers! > Sylvain -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ---- | o...@inguza.com o...@debian.org | | http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | ---------------------------------------------------------------
