Ola Lundqvist <o...@inguza.com> writes: > I based my conclusion on the fact that hog.c does not seem to have the > concept of bonded at all. > This is what I mean with "does not seem to need". But I'm new to this > code so I could very well be wrong.
I believe bonded is a global bluetooth concept, not specific to hog (which is just one protocol). See: https://codeitbro.blogspot.com/2017/04/ble-pairing-vs-bonding.html If you look at hog.c before the upstream commit was applied, it didn't have any concept of bonded either. -- Brian May <b...@debian.org>
