Hi Salvatore, On 08/04/2019 22:18, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > On 08/04/2019 21:56, Holger Levsen wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:51:19PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >>> Recently I noticed that for a no-dsa (either for no-dsa or the >>> stronger ignored) as explanation was started to be used e.g. "not used >>> by any sponsor". > Firstly, as an aside, it seemed to me that <ignored> was not stronger, > but more precise than <no-dsa> (a "sub-state" as documented at > https://security-team.debian.org/security_tracker.html#issues-not-warranting-a-security-advisory > ). > Let me know if you prefer we use <no-dsa>
Ping? :) - Sylvain
