On 25/03/2019 16:11, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hi, > > I prepared an update for ghostscript. > https://people.debian.org/~beuc/lts/ghostscript/ > > Even if we recently rebased to the latest upstream in jessie, the > upstream patches did not apply cleanly and I did my best to replicate > the changes. > Note: we ship a 9.26*a* version which upstream does not provide publicly > AFAICS (plus it was dfsg-modified), but the conflicts are due to > upstream's master branch. > > Upstream seems to keep their test suite private. The documentation > reference a "smoke.ps" file that was removed years ago, and even then it > depended on PS files that I cannot locate. > https://www.ghostscript.com/doc/9.26/Release.htm#Testing > > Is there a known test suite for ghostscript? > (or maybe we should just wait for some 9.26
[hit a shortcut by accident] (or maybe we should just wait for some 9.26b and backport it?) Cheers! Sylvain
