On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 11:44:45AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > But maybe, instead, we should just mark it as unsupported in > debian-security-support and move on. There are few packages depending on > it, in jessie: [...] > in buster: > Note that the list is (slowly) growing. marking it it unsupported in debian-security-support for jessie and stretch might be the right step forward, but if if it's really as bad as you describe, I think it should be kicked out of buster, instead of carried on.
-- tschau, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature