Hi Antoine, > I see you have the `tiff` package claimed in dla-needed.txt, but not > `tiff3`. I suspect both are fairly similar issues and that you intended > to work on both, so I figured it might be better to claim both next > time.
Right, I will prepare an upload for both packages at the same time. > But I haven't seen new activity on the packages since then, do you need > a review of the patches you submitted in March? Or for someone to carry > this work forward? Yes, I am still working on this issue. Please have a look at the bug report / upstream MR[0], last update 2 days ago. Cheers, Hugo [0] https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/merge_requests/27 -- Hugo Lefeuvre (hle) | www.owl.eu.com 4096/ 9C4F C8BF A4B0 8FC5 48EB 56B8 1962 765B B9A8 BACA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature