Hi Thorsten, 2016-05-18 22:08 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de>: > Hi Antoine, > > On Tue, 17 May 2016, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> >> Those issues should have been fixed in the same upload, > > > ah, ok, I think this is the problem. In case you know that fixing an issue > takes a longer time than usual, in my opinion it is better to fix the rest > first and do another upload later. > >> The comment regarding the status was that, since the CVEs were not >> marked as resolved, they should have been marked <no-dsa> (if you >> considered them minor enough to not warrant an upload) or you should >> have removed yourself from the "asterisk" line in dla-needed.txt so that >> others know you are not working on it anymore. > > No, the status of them is quite correct. They must not be marked <no-dsa> > and as I am working on them, my name should remain in dla-needed.txt. > Thats what I tried to express in the comment of r41394 ...
Are you still working on the remaining CVE-s? Cheers, Balint
