Hi Brian, Not luciano here but I think can reply to part of it as well:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 05:40:39PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Luciano Bello <luci...@debian.org> writes: > > > On Thursday 10 March 2016 13.39.31 Brian May wrote: > >> I have wheezy packages for testing: > >> https://people.debian.org/~bam/wheezy/imagemagick/ > >> > >> I also have jessie packages for testing: > >> https://people.debian.org/~bam/jessie/imagemagick/ > > > > Sorry for the delay in the answer here. > > > > I didn't test them functionally but they look fine from the structure > > perspective. The only small thing is that, usually, we try to avoid > > mentioning > > references to TEMP-* in the changelog. Similarly, the pointer to the LP > > number > > should be in the BTS and can be avoid in the changelog. > > Think you mean the jessie version here. I copied the changelog entries > from the sid version which do have the TEMP-* and LP references. Just remove the TEMP-*, and leave the descritpive entry (and reference to BTS were there are). The LP-Numbers can be leaved and will possibly help Ubuntu folks when they merge back changelogs (gbp-dch even has that feature to handle both Closes and LP meta-closes). > > If you didn't get any other comment, fill free to upload to security > > master. > > I'm not part of the LTS team, but I guess you can also update there. I will > > release the DSA soon. > > Assume you mean both wheezy-security and jessie-security versions? I guess yes, but Luciano has done the review. So please wait for his confirmation here. Thanks for your work! Regards, Salvatore
