On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:08:24PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> I see many packages marked:
>
> [squeeze] - foo <no-dsa> (not supported in Squeeze LTS)
>
> shouldn't that be
>
> [squeeze] - foo <end-of-life> (not supported in Squeeze LTS)
>
> since no-dsa implies that the bug migh be fixed eventually in a later
> update?
One thing I came across as well:
If it affects a package that _is_ supported (e.g. linux-2.6) but it
affects a part that is unsupported in squeeze-lts (e.g. KVM or XEN) than
no-dsa
is correct.
Cheers,
-- Guido
