On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 12:29 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > hi > > this is my first DLA, so i want to make sure i am doing this > right... Already i am worried i have skipped a step because i have > already reserved DLA-348-1 in the security tracker for this... But i > feel this is not so much of a problem as I haven't sent the advisory > just yet. > > The DLA covers an old security issue that was never fixed in squeeze, > but also a new security issue that was just pushed to security-master > for wheezy and jessie today. > > Unfortunately, i do not have a running smokeping server on squeeze to > test this (!) and since the patches are fairly small, i assume they will > just work. > > So I will shortly upload the package to squeeze-lts as is, in the hope > that it will at least fix the security issues in a timely manner. > > thanks for any feedback
If you are unable to test adequately yourself, you could also upload to e.g. people.debian.org and send a request for testing here before doing the proper upload. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
