Hi Marc, On 30.05.2015 08:44, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: > despam@shakotay:~$ clamdscan /usr/share/clamav-testfiles/* > > clamdscan-test-output.NEW > despam@shakotay:~$ diff clamdscan-test-output clamdscan-test-output.NEW > 8c8 > < /usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam_cache_emax.tgz: ClamAV-Test-File FOUND > --- > > /usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam_cache_emax.tgz: OK > 49,50c49,50 > < Infected files: 39 > < Time: 0.930 sec (0 m 0 s) > --- > > Infected files: 38 > > Time: 0.667 sec (0 m 0 s)
I think something like that would be good as an autopkgtest. Patches for this would be very welcome. ;) > Apparently, the new clamdscan cannot find viruses in tar.gz archives > (through the clamav daemon), however it works with clamscan (albeit > 10 times slower, of course): > > despam@shakotay:~$ clamscan /usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam_cache_emax.tgz > /usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam_cache_emax.tgz: ClamAV-Test-File FOUND > Time: 7.411 sec (0 m 7 s) This is really strange... > If you want more input for debugging, I am here :) Please file a bug report with 'reportbug clamav-daemon'. This will give us a way to properly track this problem and more information about your setup. Best regards, Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/556994c3.3020...@googlemail.com
