Hi, On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 19-02-15 08:38, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > Thanks for that, given the past experiences with regressions > > introduced in file updates I'd really like to keep an eye on it. > > Just an idea, couldn't we track somewhere which maintainers have > expressed their ideas about LTS? I.e. it should be easy to look up if a > maintainer (-team): > - doesn't want to be bothered about LTS at all > - in principle wants to take care himself > - wants to be involved in the process of updates > > I am lurking on this list as the maintainer of several packages (mainly > Cacti for LTS). So far I have no intent to do more for LTS, but I do > want to be involved with all the packages that I actively (co-)maintain.
Yeah, that's the kind of feature that I envisioned within the new package tracker. Each contributor would express what they are willing to work on: - maintenance in unstable - packaging new upstream versions - dealing with incoming bugs - dealing with the backlog of bugs - maintenance in testing - maintenance in stable - maintenance in lts releases But I have too many plans for the package tracker and not enough time to dedicate to it. :-( I'd gladly mentor someone trying to work on it though and review/merge patches. http://tracker.debian.org/docs/contributing.html Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150219100423.ga3...@home.ouaza.com
