Hi, On Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hmm, according to your announce this upload fixes CVE-2014-4699 which has > DSA-2972-1. > Or DSA-2949-1 for CVE-2014-3145.
so let's roll a dice? IMO there is no problem / much overhead in keeping a track of some IDs and there are some issues with the idea of reusing DSA IDs. > In this case maybe the latest one would be the best. what about cases where stable ain't affected? cheers, Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.