On Fri, 23 May 2014, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With LTS support being planned for squeeze, it would be good to also keep
> squeeze-backports{,-sloppy} open for business (for packages from wheezy,
> of course); have there been any discussions about this? sarge and etch
> backports got closed at the same time as security support was terminated
> for those releases, but it looks like lenny backports closure followed the
> move of lenny to archive.debian.org. (For that matter I'm assuming that
> squeeze itself won't be archived during the LTS period!)
I never questioned that, as long as squeeze is supported (and I count lts as
support) backports will support it too.
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140523115241.ga6...@lisa.snow-crash.org
