Roland Clobus <[email protected]> writes: > I was offline for the last two weeks. Let me give you some additional > pointers:
Thank you! I'll digest this and split up answers. > * You want to officially publish the generated images (as I see on > debian-devel), are you ready to the the quality assurance of them? > Keeping up with all nine versions (times four, for oldstable, > stable, testing and sid) keeps our openQA instance [2] rather busy. > Luckily, given that the test environment in openQA currently does not > contain any firmware-specific simulated hardware, all existing tests > would probably show exactly the same output if the Libre images were > to be tested. > How many image variants are you planning to publish? You are currently > at 3 sizes time 2 architectures. My focus is on trixie on arm64+amd64 to facilitate OS installation. Thus I don't really care about the live image part, I added the standard+gnome images just to see if I could build them in a GitLab pipeline, and was somewhat surprised it just worked (well done!). I'm still iterating on what the optimal set of images to publish are. Probably my ideal spot is somewhere between my current "slim" image (which is lacking a lot of often useful packages) and the "standard" image (which seems to contain a lot of non-essential things to get an OS installed). I would like to add riscv64 and ppc64el support. I saw a riscv64 merge request. What is the status on adding that? Would sponsoring you with riscv64/ppc64el OpenQA hardware make this easier? I could setup a VM and give a SSH root key, but alas I do not know anything about OpenQA. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
