On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:24:45 +0100 Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 05 Jan 2018, intrigeri wrote: > > Benjamin Drung: > > > Therefore move /lib/live/mount to /run/live and skip the intermedia > > > /live mount points. This reduces code and complexity. > > > > As someone who had to repeatedly bang his head against exactly this > > part of the live-boot code (last time earlier this week), I can only > > agree with the proposed simplification idea. I didn't do a full code > > review though. > > I'm not familiar enough with this part either and I am unlikely to find > any obvious mistake. But I committed the patch anyway > > It would be nice if we could test the live-boot in git before I upload > it. > > Benjamin, did you test your changes with persistence enabled? > > To whoever is following, please test and report back. Thank you.
Hi, I understand and appreciate the intent to simplify things - and by itself, I like the idea to move things to /run - but unfortunately changing mount points locations will break existing scripts. That is certainly the case for myself at $work - we have a lot of scripts to deal with installing&upgrading images, I've tested it, and they all break due to this change. In my case it's a derivative with proprietary bits, so I understand if that is treated as less important. But would it be possible to make this change optional, please? Or maybe have a backward-compatible symlinks? -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part