i was my faul too, i not specified what i using, as i understand one of that command/packages are deprecated right?
for debian wheeze what are recomended? live-build backporte or live-wrapper backported ? 2017-07-21 10:02 GMT-04:00 Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com>: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:12:16AM +0200, Andreas Heinlein wrote: > >> > >Sorry for hijacking this thread, but the two answers above are a good > >example of the problem I see on this list - what is the topic of this > >list now? > > > >At the moment, debian-live@lists.debian.org is the "Maintainer Address" > >of both live-build and live-wrapper. So we see that user A asks a > >question, user B gives an answer which is probably correct for > >live-wrapper, and user C gives another answer which is correct for > >live-build. From the topic here, we can assume that user A is using > >live-build and that user B has overlooked this, but it's not always clear. > > > >What can we do about this? Should the list be split? At least we should > >ask users to clearly indicate what they are using, e.g. by adding a > >'tag' in the subject like '[live-build] ...'. What do you think? > > I don't think we necessarily need to split the list, but at least > making it very clear in the subject line sounds like a good plan. > > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. > st...@einval.com > "I suspect most samba developers are already technically insane... Of > course, since many of them are Australians, you can't tell." -- Linus > Torvalds > >
