As far as I can see from the practical results of my builds, the
modifications of the packages are different:
The live-build package i've built from
anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-live/live-build.git/ produces
uefi-bootable hybrid-isos only when
--bootloader grub-efi
is set. But I don't want to use grub.
--bootloader syslinux
will produce a iso-hybrid image without UEFI-Suport, that is only
bootable in legacy/CSM mode.
In contrast, the Live-build- Package from Kali
(http://http.kali.org/kali/pool/main/l/live-build/live-build_20151215kali3_all.deb)
produces UEFI-bootable iso-hybrid Images with syslinux.
Is that correct, or have I overlooked something?
My build system is jessie, the target live-system too.
Am 22.09.2016 um 15:30 schrieb Machu Chukov:
Am 22.09.2016 um 15:20 schrieb Machu Chukov:
Thanks, works for me. Are there any important differences between
http://http.kali.org/kali/pool/main/l/live-build/live-build_20151215kali3_all.deb
and the package one can build from
https://github.com/rescatux/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased_10
? Both have the version number 5.0~a11-1.
respectively between the first and
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-live/live-build.git/ , where the
UEFI-patch provided by adrian15 seems to have been applied.
