Richard,

On 05/09/14 12:38 PM, Richardson, Jim (IT) wrote:
> I am trying to pin the 3.12 kernel from wheezy-backports. The following 
> preference configuration works with the except for the Version statement to 
> pin the 3.12 linux-*. Configuration will work if instead of the version 
> statement I use the release a=wheezy-backports. But the newer 3.14 kernel 
> gets build into my image. Version statement configuration will also work on a 
> standard wheezy hard drive install as expected. Any ideas?

Let's assume you're building amd64 (but the same would be true of any
kernel flavour):

linux-image-amd64 does not exist in any release as version 3.12. And in
wheezy-backports, this package depends on
linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.2-amd64. I don't know which of the things you've
mixed in from backports and unstable will cause the installation of the
wheezy-backports or unstable versions of this metapackage, but
apparently there is some dependency path back to one of these, and
that's how you end up with a 3.14 kernel in your image.

To avoid installing the linux-image-{flavour} metapackage, which never
depends on the correct kernel for your use case, specify lb config
--linux-packages linux-image-3.12-0.bpo.1 (or if you need headers too,
lb config --linux-packages "linux-image-3.12-0.bpo.1
linux-headers-3.12-0.bpo.1").

Ben


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540b4213.2010...@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca

Reply via email to