On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Daniel Baumann <dan...@debian.org> wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 06:58 AM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote: > > Since this is a > > rare use case for most users, I've abstained from further complicating > > lh_config and the config files (for now at least) - hopefully this is > > okay with you as well. > > i'm feeling bad about having internal variables made usable to the > outside, and then e.g. you depending on it as it's likely that they > could be broken by accident sometimes. i'll think about something, maybe > i'll have a better idea. > The way its named (LH_ prefix) indicates to me its not an 'internal' variable; maybe at one point it was meant to be exposed as an option? However, I agree that we should probably give more thought as to how we want to handle more advanced and esoteric options that we don't want to confuse/bother regular users with. Cheers, -- Cody A.W. Somerville Release Engineer Foundations Team Custom Engineering Solutions Group Canonical OEM Services Phone: +1 781 850 2087 Cell: +1 613 401 5141 Fax: +1 613 687 7368 Email: cody.somervi...@canonical.com
