>>>>> Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

 > Now, of course, I am wondering whether I actually need multiple
 > targets.

 > At the moment, I create one ISO file and one tar file. The tar file
 > is just there to update one thumb drive; I just mount it and untar
 > the tar file onto it; for me, this works much faster than creating a
 > usb-hdd image.

 > Would it make sense to just create an ISO image and copy the binary/
 > directory onto the thumb drive, or would that break something?

        I'd try to make both of the images and then compare the
        `md5sum.txt' files produced.  I guess that there shouldn't be
        any significant differences.

        As a side note, I'd recommend to use `rsync' instead of simply
        copying over the old system, so that the files that didn't
        change aren't written over, thus saving erase cycles.

 > All the settings for the thumb drive and the ISO file are identical,
 > except for LH_BINARY_IMAGES, of course.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to