>>>>> Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> Now, of course, I am wondering whether I actually need multiple > targets. > At the moment, I create one ISO file and one tar file. The tar file > is just there to update one thumb drive; I just mount it and untar > the tar file onto it; for me, this works much faster than creating a > usb-hdd image. > Would it make sense to just create an ISO image and copy the binary/ > directory onto the thumb drive, or would that break something? I'd try to make both of the images and then compare the `md5sum.txt' files produced. I guess that there shouldn't be any significant differences. As a side note, I'd recommend to use `rsync' instead of simply copying over the old system, so that the files that didn't change aren't written over, thus saving erase cycles. > All the settings for the thumb drive and the ISO file are identical, > except for LH_BINARY_IMAGES, of course. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]