> the idea is good. so good that we had it, too and tried it. :-) > except we did not use the kernel commandline format but the > debian-live command line format:
ok, I got it now, the parsing code of the "debian-live" syntax (scripts/live-bottom/23networking) happens too late during the boot process, so it is useless. live-initramfs (or casper) could be patched taking the ip=*) handling from scripts/nfs and putting it into scripts/live. No patch yet, dirty code. Having that done, previous syntax (nfsroot.txt) works, but then we got two different s syntax for the same things. What does the "debian-live" syntax brings ? Why not sticking with the legacy one ? -- Mathieu _______________________________________________ Debian-live-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-live-devel
